FlyerTalk Forums - View Single Post - CPU Clearance Experiences - Archive
View Single Post
Old Mar 19, 2019 | 6:24 pm
  #911  
CruiserCLE
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 678
Originally Posted by PsiFighter37
I am puzzled, though, that I haven’t been CPU’ed on my ATL-EWR flight in a couple days. It shows 2/12 - hasn’t changed in many days. Has UA done anything to slow down processing of CPUs? This should be a slam-dunk at T-96, IMO.


Originally Posted by Aussienarelle
Something similar for my SAN-ORD flight in a couple of days. Am assuming they think they can monetize the front cabin. (Actually just realized I have applied an RPU so will be ahead of the CPUs).
I can't speak to SAN-ORD but I fly ATL/EWR 1-3x/month and I've observed as of late they are opening PZ down to J2 (i.e. it will be J3 PZ1) on most of the mainline flights but none of the express flights. Seems rather odd they'd open PZ on a 5pm EWR-ATL (on a 319 (!!) nonetheless) but not on a 6am ATL-EWR that's booked 1/12 in F. [MENTION=862577]PSI[/MENTION]Figher37 I'm not sure if your flight is is mainline or express but I'd venture to guess it's not necessarily because UA thinks they can sell the seats, but rather something wrong on the backend code between mainline and express. Again, just my theory, but seems possible.

It ends up leading to 11 gate upgrades which I witnessed a few weeks ago. I know we shouldn't complain about the upgrade but would have been nice to clear at T-96 as a 1K and get your preferred seating choice. I know they could be holding off on the possibility of 175 -> 170 downgrades but it wouldn't hurt them to clear a few in advance.

Last edited by CruiserCLE; Mar 19, 2019 at 6:31 pm
CruiserCLE is offline