Originally Posted by
FrequentSherm
I understand this business rationale - but why not set a target number of nights for those that are not staying at Raffles for a week? Its always been obvious with hotel and airline schemes that monetary spend = quick status, yet there is a 'hook' for those at the lower end of the hotel range to do it by sheer commitment by segments or stays.
Its an accor wide loyalty scheme, not just rewards for the top 5 brands. For example Bonvoy ambassador has a 100 night target.
i’m agree with you. I’m not one who achieve tiers with expenses ... I have 130 nights per year with an average bill at 170-180 euro including dinner
I think would be more respectful for members to have tiers by nights. But of course, money counts.
Honestly, I think also Accor is well balanced between nights and expenses
10 k euro yearly expenses for higher tier is an average bill of 100 euro x 100 nights. A lot better than Marriot