Originally Posted by
Tim O'Brien
that's not right.
i have referred a dozen people, eight have been qualified/requalified, two have not, and two are awaiting responses.
I would love to be proven otherwise, but why have they been (re)qualified? Because they were already in a batch to qualify, but, simply not yet communicated.
Except for Stimpy, everyone has recevied a generic response, not deviating from the spend algorithm as tracked by IHG.
They don't even want to look at the adjusted stays.