Originally Posted by
Zelucifer
I'm not sure I understand the point of this thread. I understand naming and shaming properties that offer terrible breakfasts, but including properties like Beaver Creek, where it appears they aren't even offering enough for a continental breakfast... why not just claim your $100 compensation?
because they are refusing and insisting the 10 is sufficient. With the exception of the Renaissance above, they all say they are compliant so they wont provide the $100.
I think it's worth trying to identify the operator. For example, I didn't realize Kessler ... which operates nice properties... is a consistent violator.