Originally Posted by
durward1
I have noticed that gender may influence the awarding of GS status. Two women I know well both received a renewal invitation in early December, with PQD’s in the low 40’s. The husband of one was just below 50, and will finish the year near 60, and is waiting til Jan 11 to find out. It actually would make sense, as most GS members I see are men, and United likely wants a membership more closely resembling the general population
“Membership”????
I’m pretty sure UA is gender-neutral in its determination. It sees dollars, not gender. Why would UA want GS or 1K ranks or whatever to resemble the general population?
With that logic, UA should populate the Polaris cabin so that it reflects the general population.