Originally Posted by
Nicc HK
Isn't there something completely morally wrong to claim compensation from someone when it is not their fault?
I think it's perfectly reasonable to attempt to claim compensation and have the rules allow or deny the claim as appropriate. The morality is irrelevant: the outcome is bound up in the rules and the situation and if the rules are wrong it is up to the legislators to correct them, not the moral compass of those the rules are intended to protect.