FlyerTalk Forums - View Single Post - FAs Flame AA on Private Facebook Page
View Single Post
Old Oct 25, 2018, 6:24 am
  #11  
3Cforme
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Programs: DL 1 million, AA 1 mil, HH lapsed Diamond, Marriott Plat
Posts: 28,190
Originally Posted by Flight44
It should be radically different. There are far too many aircraft flying at this point. JFK, LHR, and many other airports are statistically saturated. Any weather or other event causes massive delays. There is no slack in the system at these places to absorb the investable events. The same applies to the airlines. They do not have as many spare aircraft/personnel to cover for uncertainties, most likely because this increases costs. And the flying public does not want to pay more to fly to cover those costs when some startup airline will fly cheap until they burn through their initial cash pile and the realities of the industry catch up to them. Rinse. Repeat.

Ultimately, the solutions lie in facing the reality of aviation. It is tremendously expensive to own and operate aircraft and airports. The public must be made to see this. If you want to travel between New York and London at a speed of 500+ miles per hour, safely, in a clean, well-staffed aircraft, arrive on-time at a similarly equipped and operated airport, then you must pay what it costs. And the cost must be paid by the traveler in every way. Not subsidized by gov't, the engine mfg, the aircraft mfg, or anyone else. You want to fly? You have to pay.
You're kidding, right? Comrade? Comrade?

Capitalism allows enthusiastic investors to demonstrate belief in a business plan by funding it. There's heavy institutional ownership of U.S. airlines and Honeywell, GE, UTX... at this point. These investors are not naive nor uninformed.

U.S. airlines have been making pretty good money for the last five years. Margins aren't uniform but decently-run carriers are surely covering their cost of capital. That is one definition of financial sustainability.

Fewer flights/seats might make the (very few) capacity-constrained U.S. airports more operationally efficient. The other 400 airports with scheduled passenger service don't really have a problem. Fewer flights/seats would surely drive up prices. Why do prices need to be higher when carriers are making good profits?
3Cforme is offline