Originally Posted by ILuvParis
The first one was years ago. The second, no comment.
But then, you've seen one, you've seen 'em all, right?
I was confining my answer to the FT family audience, because I am always concerned about the children.
Now if you're going to throw the Keller into the mix, it's a different story altogether-we need to redefine our parameters.
Now, having redefined our parameters to include the Keller, strangely I find that I can maintain the statement "Seen one, seen'em all" in all its glorious validity.
Innit weird?