FlyerTalk Forums - View Single Post - BA ranked worst TATL carrier for fuel efficiency
Old Sep 14, 2018 | 6:00 am
  #10  
ironmouse
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: TNR
Programs: BAEC Silver, *A Gold
Posts: 237
Originally Posted by rapidex
S
Statistics and damned lies. If BA removed all the premium cabins and fitted hundreds more Y seats, then you would see a different result.
Surely the main reason for the demise of the 747 is its fuel efficiency. Sure you would get a different result with more Y seats, but no matter how tightly you pack in the pax it's never going to compete with the 787-9 and the A350 with similar configuration.
But whatever, BA turn in a profit so can't be that bad.
ironmouse is offline