FlyerTalk Forums - View Single Post - BA ranked worst TATL carrier for fuel efficiency
Old Sep 14, 2018 | 4:48 am
  #9  
rapidex
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 5,888
Originally Posted by ironmouse
https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/newt...ewthread&f=446

https://www.aviation24.be/airlines/n...a-second-time/
I’m sure there is a valid reason for BA to persist with the 747’s and the A380’s , but when you see that they burn 63% more fuel per passenger KM it doesn’t appear to make a lot of economical sense.

I appreciate that the list takes into account the number of premium seats that BA offers against the high loads of Norwegian and Wow but even so these 4 engine planes are comparative gas guzzlers v the A350, 787-9 etc.

BA say that they will deliver a 25% improvement in Carbon emissions by 2025 is that supposed to co-inside with the phasing out of the 747’s ?
S
Statistics and damned lies. If BA removed all the premium cabins and fitted hundreds more Y seats, then you would see a different result.
rapidex is offline