Originally Posted by
COSPILOT
Why do you assume the OP is 100% correct and the FA is lying? My wife is in criminal law and doesn't assume anything, ever. She investigates. OP failed to file a police report, there is apparently zero witnesses, claims he saw stars, but was focused on the connecting flight. So your assumption that the FA is lying is absurd without proof.
This isn't a court of law, it's a message board. As such, there is no burden of proof that the OP must present.
OP and attacker were seated in Row 1, right in front of the FA's. You want me to believe that none of the FA's saw the initial assault, the 2nd assault, or heard the threat? Sorry not buying that. Not now, not in a million years.