Originally Posted by
YYC009
So you want airlines to have a lot more crew members to be deadheading around the globe every time there is a risk of weather. Hmmm. I guess ticket prices must go up to hire all these extra crew members. I also guess because it is weather planning, there is no DBC for the passengers that are being bumped for the crew to take up seats on the YYZYHZ flight?
Don't know what the poster you're responding to wants, but I would just like AC and other airlines to take responsibility for the entirely previsible risk of irrops - pay compensation, get crew in, that should be their choice. Customer should not be responsible for AC's choice of crew plan
Originally Posted by
YYC009
Do you only want AC to be proactive for flights to/from Europe because of the EU law? If this was a YYZ-YHZ-YYT routing, you would be okay with AC cancelling YHZYYT and return YYTYHZ due to weather at YYZ?
Again, I'm not the person you replied to, but I would like other governments to follow suit, then this question would be moot.
Originally Posted by
YYC009
At the end of the day we can discuss back and forth all day long. It's fun, honest. I love the discussion. But the OP has to decide if they want to wage this battle. It will be a battle.
Agree with you on that part.