Originally Posted by
davie355
Hard disagree. No-Fly is an affront to humanity (restriction of free movement). Convicted assailants should be in prison, but any non-incarcerated citizen ought to be able to travel by air as a right, not a privilege.
How does that work, the right to fly? If manned flight had never been invented, does one still have the right to fly?
There are plenty of ways to have "free movement" - walk, run, car, bus, train, boat, scooter. Limiting someone's ability to get on a plane does in no way infringe on their right to free movement.