Originally Posted by
ATOBTTR
How this “unethical”? Crappy situation? Yes but your post implies Delta maliciously pulled the plane to screw over your friend. But that’s pretty unlikely. Delta has no idea your friend was flying to see a dying relative. Unless it’s a charter, Delta probably has little to no insight on why any passengers are traveling specifically. And far all you know, someone on the MKE flight was able to make it to see a dying relative in MKE because of the swap. Here Delta made an operational decision, not an unethical one. For all you know Delta was carrying critical cargo to MKE or needed to get the jet to MKE to bring critical cargo back to MSP. What would have been less unethical? Putting passengers on a plane that had MX issues? This is not to say it doesn’t suck for your friend or that your friend can’t feel disappointed in the MX cancellation and swap or disappointed and frustrated at DL in general but to go as far as calling the swap “unethical” on DL’s part is way out there.
Valid points but then it could also be argued that the passenger wasn't acting maliciously but suffering from some sort of medical or mental episode.
I would really like to see the contract of carriage challenged in court. It shouldn't be allowed to be so broad. The only beneficiary of it is the airline. Essentially it says that Delta just has to get me to my destination at some point. Why shouldn't the airline have to face a failure to perform lawsuit when they royally screw up? I have to pay Delta immediately when I book a ticket. I am at their mercy from that point on. Delta should be allowed a small margin of error for weather delays but beyond that they should be required to get me to my destination on time and perform all services advertised. Otherwise it is a failure to perform and they should be prepared to pay up.