Originally Posted by
longtimeflyin
Shocking to me that while SOPs were followed, that so many checks and balances did not prevent an aircraft to depart when it clearly should not have done so. The SOPs were insufficient to adequately have prevented a damaged airframe from leaving the ground.
Vs
Neither the aircraft manufacturer nor Jazz provide the flight crew with a definition of a hard landing or
criteria to determine what a hard landing is.
I'm impressed your manage clarity when the OEM and operator does not.
Crystal clear to me that the airframe did not meet a threshold of unserviceablility. EHUMS isn't regulatory. The next flight was fine (apparently).