Originally Posted by
lost_in_translation
I'm not sure that necessarily holds at all - EK operates only A380s to LHR and I'm fairly sure if they could pick up some more slots cheaply to add more service frequency they wouldn't say no. CX and QR both recently started flying from LGW again partly because they'd both like more LHR slots but can't get any. SQ I'm not sure about but I'm sceptical they'd refuse the chance to add another LHR rotation also. It's only really BA on that list that wants a standstill on LHR growth.
witrh respect you miss my point. The ARTICLE leads with the impression BA dominates that list and hence "of course" it is happy to be a .... airline operating from a slot constrained airport/against expansion etc.
My point was that they feature only once ex LHR and that others, following the journalists own logic, ought be to just as inclined to oppose LHR expansion based on that same logic.