Yeah, that's what I thought. The agent said no and when I reread the terms it said this:

"Damage or theft resulting from abuse, intentional acts, fraud, hostilities of any kind (including, but not limited to, war, invasion, rebellion, or insurrection), confiscation by the authorities, risks of contraband, illegal activities, normal wear and tear, flood, earthquake, radioactive contamination, or damage from inherent product defects."

So maybe they are trying to avoid honoring claim by saying damaged circuit board is "normal wear and tear" or "product defects".

Anyone successful making a liquid damage claim?