Originally Posted by
Proudelitist
The WN model? You mean the model that offers absolutely NOTHING? No F, no lounges, almost no Intl', no code share with One World or Star Alliance, no advanced seating reservations, no food..and an ff program that offers little more than marginally better odds at a COACH seat? That WN? The McDonalds of the sky with the undignified cornball schtick?
Also no CRJ-200s, no change fees, no checked luggage fees, a simple to understand boarding system, and a very straightforward redemption system that doesn't require reading FT to understand the byzantine complexity of, plus decades of being well below the legacies in generating DOT complaints (which are a good first-order approximation of being able to resolve service failures).
WN gets slagged here for not providing people with access to Krug, caviar and lie-flat showers, but frankly, a lot of people don't need or desire them. I wouldn't send my mom to fly AA on a dare- she's not an inexperienced flier but wouldn't fly enough for elite status anywhere, and WN treats people coming in off the street better than anyone else. And honestly on a twoish hour flight or less I don't really care if the airline is serving me food I'd often send back at a Denny's, or even something on the edible side, and I AM an experienced flier. A coach seat at a price I can afford and with some flexibility if plans change is pretty useful to me, and for a lot of other people. If it wasn't WN would be bankrupt (something UA, DL and AA couldn't avoid), out of business, or maybe still flying 3 planes between 3 cities in Texas.
AA has it's place, but the reflexive WN hate here just shows me people don't get the model. Which is fine, WN flies 700 or so planes a day for people who DO get that model.