Originally Posted by
MSPeconomist
I also want to say that I consider it extremely unfair that someone with 100 Starwood nights, regardless of spend, is immediately assigned an Ambassador while those on the MR side are not, plus we are subject to the yet-to-be-clarified $20,000 revenue requirement.[/left]
I don't find it unfair at all that members in the two different programs will be treated as defined in the two different programs, just as they've been treated for years, until the programs merge. Did you find them unfair three years ago, just on the general principal that the programs offer different benefits?