Originally Posted by
avi8tir
For those of us that sit in the front all the time, this looks terrible. The new F seats suck already (oddly proportioned, tray table too low, arm rests too low) and now they've removed the partition between F and Y. l would also guess that 4AB have limited recline due to the lav behind it. I guess Im already used to no tv's so that's not worth a mention.
Great product!
5AB? They haven't removed the a row of F, have they?
Originally Posted by
qukslvr619
Yeah the "mud-flap" dividers between F/Y really seem to be heading towards the standard these days. At least the older cloth dividers seemed to come down to the seatback level whereas the new style its almost a joke as they really don't do much of anything. NW's love of them seemed to migrate over to DL when they retrofitted all of their aircraft. AA has them on their new deliveries, and now UA seems to be headed that direction. Not a fan.
Originally Posted by
CHOPCHOP767
Agreed. On DL, a few times, when I have been sitting in the last row of F, the pax in Comfort+ must have thought the arm rest was some sort of foot stool and propped their feet up. The plastic dividers look cheap on DL; same with UA. My favorite narrowbody with UA is the A319 largely due to the small F cabin.
Originally Posted by
Kacee
Yes I've had this on several of the newer Skywest/DL E175s and don't like it at all. I assume it's weight savings? I would avoid the last row of F on these aircraft. (Actually I would avoid these aircraft in general due to the ridiculous lavs, but that's a different point.)
I thought I'd read somewhere that the wall was removed so that the last row of F could have full recline. If that's not the case, it's an unmitigated downgrade. But even if it is the case, on balance it's worse.