Originally Posted by
flyino07
I had used MR LNF a couple years ago myself; had no issues with process and outcomes. I've worked as consultant on major mergers before, nothing about this transitional SPG BRG/LNF makes sense. Whoever was in charge of this dropped the ball spectacularly. Had they unified the policies and their application, it would be perfectly understandable -- that's where we are heading anyways. But implementing different standards (even if accidental) between the two teams makes no sense whatsoever.
Agree, and in this context it would have been logical to align the SPG LNF practice to the existing practice at MR LNF but what is logical does seem so far fall on deaf ears ...