FlyerTalk Forums - View Single Post - More award availability restricted by married segments / connections
Old May 21, 2018 | 9:14 am
  #160  
LAX_Esq
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: LAX
Programs: AA PLT / 2MM
Posts: 2,145
Originally Posted by CloudCoder
What's with all the hypotheticals? Can we use real airport codes? Are fake codes considered "safer" or "cooler"? I suppose there's always a risk that if I find out your travel plans, I might book the seat directly in front of you and take a double-helping of mixed nuts and then you won't get any. But surely that's a tiny risk. If we all get to vote, I vote that we use real airport codes.
Discussing AAA-BBB-CCC-DDD is cleaner and easier to read, and avoids confusing the post with extraneous information. Our brains can understand "BBB-CCC wasn't available but AAA-BBB-CCC was available so I called 7 times to drop AAA-BBB." One poster's airport codes are irrelevant to the next poster trying to deal with this "married segment" garbage for his/her own route.

Originally Posted by beachfan

Now we know how they improved so much in a recent ranking


Nothing like a nine hour layover after a redeye
Would love to hear AA apologists explain....
LAX_Esq is offline