Originally Posted by
saizai
Do they in fact make such claims? Under oath? Please show me where. I'd love to impeach them.
See Corbett brief above.
What I've seen is mere
hypotheticals. There's not even a claim
to take at face value, let alone any value to that face.
Yes.
IF.
This would also be the result of my litigation. Although it'll take years, my bet is that I'm the more likely and faster means of achieving that objective.
The TSA Administrator just in the last couple of months gave a talk at a university and recognized a few TSA screeners. His remarks included the claim of the constant probing and testing. It may have been George Washington. There was FT thread about it.
Edit to add:
Not sworn.....
Pekoske's remarks
We can no longer focus only on preventing the bad guys from getting into the secure area of an airport. More and more we must focus on both sides of the checkpoint and in the public areas where airport and surface transportation systems intersect. We face ambitious adversaries who are continuously looking for a point of attack and waiting for their opportunity. Our job is to make sure they never have that opportunity.