FlyerTalk Forums - View Single Post - Why does Lufthansa hub in FRA/MUC, and not Berlin and/or Hamburg?
Old Apr 10, 2018, 5:40 pm
  #12  
RolfD
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Berlin, TXL
Programs: OW Emerald, *A gold, Skyteam elite plus, Hilton gold, SPG gold
Posts: 339
Originally Posted by tsolaaa
If you have ever been to TXL or SXF, you will understand why Lufthansa couldn't make either a hub.

TXL is old, outdated and extremely small, they don't have the space for planes. They don't even have a lounge past security as each gate is separated with their own security. You walk 7 meters from the curb to the check in counter and then another 7 meters to the gate. (In terminal A anyways) Terminal C is simply a large quonset hut where everyone either walks over the runway to get to their planes or takes a bus. The only public transport to TXL is via bus service.

Both airports are simply not equipped to house planes, especially larger aircraft.

Don't get me started with SXF, it's basically a giant Burger King where everyone sits on the floor cause there is absolutely no room.

The longest long-haul I think TXL offers is TXL > EWR, which is once a day with United. Could be totally wrong here!
actually TXL has a lounge in terminal C after you clear security. TXL is a slot control airport. LH is not interested in developing a hub in Berlin ( even if the new airport is open). The vacuum left by Airberlin is been filled by Aircanada Rouge, Delta, Scoot, Hainan, Qatar and United.
finally Lufthansa attitude towards Berlin resulted in a huge expansion by EasyJet ( Second biggest hub after LGW) and Ryanair/laudamotion.

Finally the airport is fast. You walk 100 meters from the check-in counter to the plane and 50 meters from the plane to immigration and luggage carousel.

RolfD is offline