Originally Posted by
ffsim
I can tell you, there were questions of the exact opposite nature, too. ... Now, as I've already said twice, doing something of value with those conclusions is a totally different story.
Well that's interesting there were opposite questions too. As I said, it's evident that CROP is an organization that seemingly prides itself on asking charged questions.
But what's the (corporate) use of questions that are charged? Even with "opposite" questions, that just means the survey is asking charged questions; having pendulum swings does not make a balanced survey
If the goal of AE was to raise their profile, they've succeeded.
If the goal of AE was to try and gain some deeper insight in people who collect points, they need to decide if this is their way forward. I for one, disagree with the nature of the questions (as portrayed on CBC) and still cannot see any productive corporate use of this kind of data.