Originally Posted by
lorath
Curious post. I felt that the OP presented a balanced summary of the 2 competing offerings and did so without bias or malice. Are you replying to a different post or thread because your post is out of all prroportion to the OP’s analysis.
Well, to begin with OP makes numerous comments comparing the lounges and shower facilities. They aren’t even comparing LH lounges.
As for bias and malice perhaps you should look at some of their previous posts which do indicate that the OP has little history of travel with BA and has been predominantly negative. With that attitude they were never going to be looking objectively. It’s a bit like most of us when faced with the prospect of flying FR. And no, I don’t think my post is out of proportion. OP has commented and I have responded, even given a clear reason which I have repeated above.
Do you think it is appropriate to compare the two lounge offerings when one isn’t even LH? Perhaps a more realistic offering would be with the LH lounge at MUC or FRA, or at least compare to the CX/QF offerings in T3.