whoever at this unnamed property is telling you this is wrong since first reservation does not even require the guest name to be known (although intl props require their passport) so second reservation in another acct do not need to list A as the guest of B.
Originally Posted by
polarpacific
I completely agree with you, Srisarin.
The problem is that the hotel is insisting that physical occupancy of Member A in a room under Member B account for the second night means that Member A cannot check out and close the folio from the first night under Member A account