Originally Posted by
narvik
OP's travel companion DH (whatever that is) took 21D.
Yes, I saw that. My question is, if that is such a great seat that someone wouldn't mind being separated from their traveling companions to sit in it, why didn't she sit in it? Or why wasn't she happy that her Darling Husband was enjoying that supposedly much better seat? Clearly she did not see that as the better option, yet she seems to think others should think it is.
Not the same person. Lost luggage happened to someone other than the person who was asked to switch seats.
She wrote:
"I should have said something to him but did not. Karma got him as their luggage went missing - we saw him wait at the baggage carousel for their bags and then saw him walk to the luggage office dejected.
PPS That karma is for bullying my DD with armrest control - NOT for staying put in his assigned seat."
I think "him" is the same person. Or am I missing something? Sincerely confused.