FlyerTalk Forums - View Single Post - The SAS | EuroBonus Forum Kafé
View Single Post
Old Mar 10, 2018 | 4:46 am
  #4526  
CPH-Flyer
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Community Builder
Community Influencer
All eyes on you!
10 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Tokyo
Programs: JAL Diamond Metal (OWE), SK Gold (STE+, LTG), UA Platinum(*G),Marriott Titanium (LTP)
Posts: 26,486
Originally Posted by GUWonder





I know what the proponents of this action claim they are doing by way of this action at CPH, but it still strikes me as being a dog and pony show with a dog whistle of sort, especially as this is anything but a highly effective approach for anything but PR purposes.




The burden of proof to show social security benefits misuse should rest upon the state and be the same regardless of intra-EU international travel or not. Given intra-EU cooperation is more of a given than cooperation beyond the EU, hunting after travelers coming from beyond the EU/Schengen area seems to be of less questionable effectiveness, no less so as the travelers can claim to be doing the same thing as those traveling internationally within the EU.


The checks have more than zero relevance to people using CPH, including people like me who have no claim history to any Danish unemployment benefits. Absent evidence of wrongdoing, people being targeted in a law enforcement fishing expedition at CPH is a concern even for those of us not using Danish unemployment benefits. If I’m asked for a CPR at CPH, who is going to ask and where? And what’s the consequence for people like me telling those asking for it to go pound sand when asked for a CPR?

CPH has become a massive mess for travel between the Schengen and non-Schengen area within the past couple of years, and any governmental law enforcement action that further slows down CPH passengers is not welcome by me.

It would seem a less than efficient way of checking, and yes I do believe it is mainly a window dressing exercise to appease the non government part of the current government's parliamentary majority. Yet I am surprised that they found 21 potential cases in one day of checking, so somehow they must make it work. And they may even have a point.

The burden of proof is indeed on the side of the authorities, and is basically the same. But it may just be easier to lift under certain circumstances, or at least be perceived to be easier to lift.

I am not sure what happens if/when people refuse to answer and asks them to take a hike. Can you test and update us? I don't have a stop in Copenhagen scheduled before July? The question is how to get in to their sights ....
CPH-Flyer is offline