Originally Posted by
songsc
Of course not. Advocating male rights won't buy as much votes.
Good to see the voters are sexist in the opposite way they claim society is .
I am not pushing for 50/50 splits. I am just suggesting that universities have no choice but getting in enough female students and faculty members in STEM. Funding is linked to gender ratio.
linking funding to gender ratio is discrimination. Linking it to money pretty much guarantees it will be twisted and corrupted over time . How about just allow the best and the brightest in? You know, merit based acceptance.