FlyerTalk Forums - View Single Post - New RA qualifying criteria based on IC Revenue
Old Dec 20, 2017 | 12:21 pm
  #1963  
Land-of-Miles
FlyerTalk Evangelist
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: MAN and LON
Programs: Mucci, BAEC LT Gold, HH Dia, MR LT Plat, IHG Diamond Amb, Amex Plat
Posts: 13,922
Originally Posted by samjnz
Hmmm this is all making me re-evaluate my stays for next year particularly with the annoying calendar year qualification window.

My situation is that I recently started ramping up my hotel nights around September this year so I don't have the advantage of a full year of IC history to qualify for RA -- even with a bunch of stays next year, it seems the earliest I will be able to quality is 2019!

On the other hand, if I moved over to SPG I'd have a good shot at getting SPG Platinum 100, etc during the year.

Interested to hear anyone else's experiences with SPG Platinum with regards to upgrades compared to Ambassador + RA -- is there that much of a difference?
There is increasingly less of a difference between SPG Plat and IC RA when you strip out the minibar I think SPG wins. However I am not sure that SPG 100 is worth that much, would rather have RA and SPG LTP/50 or 75 than just SPG 100. I am now actively starting to prefer Marriotts as a MR Plat over IC in many IC locations where the IC is not good (and there are so many of those).
Land-of-Miles is online now