FlyerTalk Forums - View Single Post - TSA Using Passenger Screening Dogs
View Single Post
Old Nov 29, 2017 | 9:47 am
  #88  
FliesWay2Much
FlyerTalk Evangelist
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: An NPR mind living in a Fox News world
Posts: 14,343
Originally Posted by Section 107
The first sentence might be a little bit misleading to some readers in that it seems to imply that an individual dog does both types of detection when I think you meant that most airport LEAs have explosives detection dogs and narcotics detection dogs.
I had some USAF security police tell me a while back that it's easy to tell what a dog is doing by how they alert. A drug dog goes crazy because he has found the "toy" and is expecting a reward for "winning" the game. A bomb dog points & freezes, proving that they are, in fact, smarter than humans.

Originally Posted by GUWonder
Would you rule out the possibility of a dog handler training the dog to alert on people/things for more than just one purpose? Dogs do sometimes get re-purposed, even officially.
There is plenty of evidence out on the worldwide web to indicate that a cop can make a drug dog look like he's alerting anytime they want. There has to be a video in order to be able to prove the deception in court.

From a court case a few years ago (Florida vs Jardines), an opinion filed by the Loyola University of new Orleans College of Law clearly noted that doggies and (TSA ETD machines for that matter) don't actually find drugs (or explosives). They find residue that could be from anything. Someday, a Supreme Court will completely invalidate these methods as reasonable suspicion or probable cause:

Scientific research now establishes that drug-detection dogs do not alert to the contraband itself. Instead, drug-detection dogs alert to certain volatile substances – generally, break-down products of the illegal drug. These decomposition odor constituents are in no way illegal or even unique to contraband. In fact, these volatile molecules or compounds are also found in substantial quantities in ordinary household items. Therefore, rather than detecting the contraband itself, a detection dog's alert to these entirely legal molecules or compounds instead produces an inference that contraband is also present. Because the canine-sniff technique relies on detection of noncontraband molecules and compounds within a home as the basis to infer that contraband is hidden inside, a canine drug-detection sniff is "capable of detecting lawful activity" within the home. Scientific research establishes that instead of smelling cocaine, drug-detection dogs alert to methyl benzoate – an odor shared by snapdragons, petunias, perfumes and food additives. Instead of smelling heroin, drug-detection dogs alert to acetic acid – an odor shared by vinegar and aspirin that is past its prime. Instead of smelling MDMA ("Ecstasy"), drug-detection dogs alert to piperonal – an odor shared by soap, perfume, food additives and even lice repellant. (citation omitted)

— Brief of amici curiae Fourth Amendment Scholars in support of respondent[36]
FliesWay2Much is offline