FlyerTalk Forums - View Single Post - End-on-End Ticketing - Definition?
View Single Post
Old Nov 27, 2017 | 3:54 am
  #3  
sbm12
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
10 Countries Visited20 Countries Visited30 Countries Visited20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: PSM
Posts: 69,232
Originally Posted by Explore
Say I want to fly KUL-LHR-ARN on BA, returning a week later. Then I buy a separate ticket, also from BA for ARN-LHR-LAX and return, nested inside the other itinerary. I will not be combining the tickets. Even though the tickets aren't combined, are they considered end-to-end (not allowed), or simply a side trip (allowed).
I'm posting the question here because it seems generic within IATA.
It is not end-on-end. That's a specific construct of fares where A-B + B-C are sold as a single itinerary with two fare components. It is also not a side trip as you are buying separate tickets.

The main thing to look as is if you are avoiding a minimum stay rule with the bookings, especially if returning to the point of origin. In your case the nested "return" is to LAX, not KUL, so no issues there.

Originally Posted by EuropeanPete
There is no issue with any kind of nesting with BA.
This is a broad statement and not one I'm sure stands up to review.
sbm12 is offline