Originally Posted by
iamflyer
I take that to mean there must have been at least some original warranty.
Originally Posted by
threeoh
The language is pretty clear that it extends an existing warranty, and the extended coverage only covers the same types of costs covered by the original warranty. I do not think it is possible to construe it as creating a warranty where there wasn't one originally.
If you're within 120 days you could try Purchase Protection (for damage), or within 90 days you could try Return Protection. But I think if it's been a full year and there was no original warranty, there is no CSR protection that covers that.
Yes, I stand corrected. Since the extended warranty has the same terms as the original, with an added duration, without an original warranty you'd be extending the...lack of warranty.