FlyerTalk Forums - View Single Post - Boarding Area's Fall
View Single Post
Old Nov 15, 2017 | 2:31 am
  #1164  
GUWonder
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Watchlisted by the prejudiced, en route to purgatory
Programs: Just Say No to Fleecing and Blacklisting
Posts: 102,077
Originally Posted by Nicoolio
I believe the reason airlines went with miles was two-fold -- first being that they didn't want to create a taxable event for customers and using dollars would put the programs front and center with the IRS. Miles are harder to value.The second is at the time, I don't think the airlines could easily track revenue. Mileage was easier as it meant base miles for each segment were set once and could be easily tracked.
Reported segments flown tied back to reported flight ticket coupons, as financial settlement mechanisms existed for the airlines even before Carter approved airline deregulation spurred FFPs into what they became. But process limitations, including those related to technology and costs, indeed made tracking customers business simpler on some lines than other lines. But miles rather than money was for a market where point-to-point service wasn’t as much of a competitive concern for the deregulated airlines as competition against other one/multi-stop connecting service providers.

The airlines had excess capacity, and retail consumer-oriented FFPs allowing for customer use of that excess capacity on the basis of prior business was like giving funny money as a rebate instead of giving real cash back as a rebate. The tax consequences upon customers didn’t seem to be a major factor at the start as the airlines have been giving USD-denominated rebate commissions back to “loyal customers” for even longer than there have been retail customer FFPs; and other loyalty programs giving USD-denominated rebates limited to a funny money market place has been going on for as long as we’ve had an IRS.

Last edited by GUWonder; Nov 15, 2017 at 2:38 am
GUWonder is offline