Originally Posted by
krazykanuck
Problem with airports like Paris, and Heathrow, is they're a pain to get from terminal to terminal and making the lounge easily accessable to only a portion of travelers diminishes the value, or the point, of having a Centurion Lounge.
If you look at where Amex has chosen to put Centurion Lounges in the US, they tend to have most or all terminals connected airside (LGA being the clear exception). I've opined on this forum before that that reason is probably a large part why LAX, ORD, and JFK don't have Centurion Lounges, seeing as how they tick the no brainer box pretty easily for where Amex would seemingly want to have a presence.
That makes sense, although AMS is one European airport that has connected terminals. And it is a major hub, so maybe one day it'll go there.
I live in the US, but like 85% of my travel is to Europe, so I don't get to visit any centurion lounge other than the one in Seattle, which is so small and crowded.