Originally Posted by
numbiceman
Recently did a YYZ-LHR-BLR BA92/ BA119 - WT, while the YYZ-LHR was on a new 787 was a beauty. The second leg was on a 777 G-YMMF about 17 years old, the cabin was pretty gloomy. No power outlets( i did read somewhere most BA a/c dont have power outlet in WT), old IFE. The seat was uncomfortable despite being on exit row. So much so I had a stiff back. I have paid for an upgrade to WT+ on my return. But just wondering if its going to be any different. From what I see LHR-BLR is weekly once on G-YMMF and quite often G-YMM* so old a/c.
Has anyone experienced the same?
Also any reco for YYZ-BLR? Preferably Y or Prem Economy. Thanks!
TY!
I think the key reason why you are seeing the difference in aircraft is due to competition. On LON-YYZ, BA have to compete with other non stop carriers such as Air Canada, Air Transat and Westjet so they are more likely to offer the latest and newest aircraft. Whereas for LON-BLR, I believe they have a monopoly on non-stop flights and could probably afford to offer a sub-par product without impacting on margin/demand.
Unfortunately, by paying money to upgrade to WT+ (and your reason is very valid), BA are effectively being rewarded with extra cash for offering a poor product in Y.
In terms of WT+, you do get a wider and more comfortable seat, with more leg room and better food, with the first main course from the Club World menu.
May I ask why you chose to book with BA rather than other one-stop options such as Air France, Emirates, Etihad, Lufthansa or Jet Airways?