Originally Posted by
gobluetwo
Is this guy serious? Per the googles, doesn't seem like advertising champagne and serving sparkling wine rises to the level of "high-handed, malicious" and "highly reprehensible." I guess unless you're the snobbiest of wine snobs...
https://www.lindsayllp.ca/the-histor...ges-in-canada/
I suppose the judge could rule in the plaintiff's favor, award him $10, and call it a day.
Or a cheap $10 of not so well known Champagne.