Originally Posted by
AMflier
If she was asking Southwest for an epi-pen, and was not carrying her own with her in case of contact with an animal, I suspect that her allergies were not as severe as stated.
Her lawyers claim Southwest lied:
She discussed her allergies with Southwest representatives upon entering the aircraft, and they came to the mutual conclusion that she should sit in a seat “comfortably distant from the animals."
She was never asked for any medical certification — which she doesn’t carry anyway because her allergies are not life-threatening, contrary to what Southwest claimed she told them — and was eventually asked to leave the plane.
WJZ
They claim she never asked for the dogs to be removed from the plane. And never claimed that her allergies were life-threatening.
The imperative for both sides now: finding witnesses.