Originally Posted by
Worcester
You have some right points but I think this is Political rather than Security
I base this premise on the following
1. No airliner has been brought down by a bomb in the cabin, while several have been through bombs in the hold
2. There is a very real threat from batteries in the hold where if they catch fire the fire cannot be dealt with
3. A terrorist capable of building a bomb invisible to x-ray machines is capable also of driving to an airport where electronics are allowed in the cabin
4. No other government thinks there is the intelligence to support such a move
It's very difficult to come to any conclusions like this since we (as an FT community) really don't have access to the security information which the authorities are working with.