There is no revenue sharing with KE yet. The initial JV and ATI application was approved by the USG years ago, but it was only recently that they got together with KE for an actual pricing coordination/revenue sharing JV agreement. This new agreement is still awaiting approval from Korean authorities. KL flights that earn based on spend are limited to TATL routes (where DL/KL have ATI and share revenue and coordinate on pricing). It's not unreasonable to assume that the other routes where that have ATI and revenue/pricing sharing will end up being the same. Outside of that, I wouldn't expect that to be the case with other routes and partners where there is no ATI.
Last edited by xliioper; Oct 2, 2017 at 9:34 am