Originally Posted by
flyerby
I'm want to go from BKK to FRA in F.
Can either go directly TG A380 or BKK-ICN TG 747 and then ICN-FRA OZ A380.
It's an extra 12 detour (about 6 hours to ICN and a 6 hour stopover at ICN) but I don't mind.
I'm asking from the experience perspective which would be a better option?
There's no difference in the amount of miles needed.
Thanks.
This seems to be too much even for a hard-core flyer talker... Why would anyone sane spent extra 12 hours on 11hour 35 minutes flight is beyond my comprehension...
Originally Posted by
sbm12
I'm trying to figure out what about the OZ F experience could make it be worth 12 extra hours en route. Especially when it also means a 5.5 hour redeye flight on TG.
The TG F seat is solid on the A380. Service is, as is typical with TG, hit or miss. But still not worth the inconvenience and time of the connecting route.
+100