Originally Posted by
EuropeanPete
It's obviously impossible to say which location is better. Knightsbridge has become a theme park for rich Russians, Arabs and Americans and so you will almost never see anyone who lives in London going anywhere near there. It's fascinating, but in a pretty awful way.
Equally though, calling the drug-infested den of inequity which is Kings Cross a clearly "better" location is perhaps pushing things slightly. I'd certainly always pick Kings Cross over Knightsbridge as a base for London though.
I would say that labelling Knightsbridge a "theme park for rich Russians, Arabs and Americans" and Kings Cross a "drug-infested den of inequity" is pushing things slightly too.
Are either of these
really that polarised ?
Originally Posted by
raunow
Posh boutique luxury in central London
Nice review, thanks. ^