Originally Posted by
CloudCoder
Perhaps it was a typo? I'm at 97 nights and this promised "benefit" has yet to put in even a cameo appearance. Obviously, the original announcement omitted a digit. Let's hope it was a leading (160 nights?) digit instead of a trailing (600 nights?) digit.
A leading digit could be far worse. The most it could be trailing is 609, while it could run as high as 960 for a leading digit. In all likelihood, leading AND trailing, or 9609 nights.