Originally Posted by
slopeboy40
Is it a coincidence or a crock that a couple both have the same "medical" issue that requires each of them to have an "emotional support animal"?
Don't get me going on the ESA thing. Yes, there are SOME legitimate needs. But I would say 90% are to avoid the fees. And it is that 90% that makes us look down on the 10% legitimate ones. Needs to be a certification process like true Service dogs. All I'm going to say on the subject.