The loss of GF in real terms apparently means (from previous posts on other threads) that people over 6'6" are best off picking a different airline rather than flying Polaris. I always thought GF was a poor product anyway (compared with say LH F). However but for the few rev customers it will unfortunately impact, I think it was a smart business decision to get rid of it
Originally Posted by
kevanyalowitz
And while they say the Polaris seat dimensions mirror that of GF, I found the seat to be very tight, including the cubby for your feet.
I agree, however It depends what seat you get - some have less protrusions into the seat space making the seat area feel bigger and there are 3 different types of foot well