FlyerTalk Forums - View Single Post - Why ITO-LAX, not ITO-SFO?
View Single Post
Old Jun 12, 2017 | 10:32 am
  #6  
DA201
100 Countries Visited
150 Countries Visited
200 Countries Visited
10 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Programs: UA Million Mile, Mileage Plus Premier 1K, SkyMiles Gold Medallion, AAdvantage Gold
Posts: 876
UA prefers SFO over LAX unless there is a massive gap in O&D. For traffic to "business cities" like SIN or PVG, the difference is smaller due to SFO's large tech industry. For more "leisure" and VFR cities, the difference can be massive because the LA area has a much larger population than the Bay Area. MEL is probably the exception to this rule because SFO-MEL is pushing the range on the Dreamliner, and UA did not know the capabilities of the Dreamliner a few years ago like it does today. UA credited LAX-MEL as being the reason they knew the Dreamliner could handle SFO-SIN.
DA201 is offline