FlyerTalk Forums - View Single Post - Why ITO-LAX, not ITO-SFO?
Thread: Why ITO-LAX, not ITO-SFO?
View Single Post
Old Jun 11, 2017 | 8:07 pm
  #2  
nevansm
2M
60 Nights
100 Countries Visited
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: USA
Programs: 1K 1MM; Bonvoy Ambassador; Nat'l EE; Hertz PC; Hyatt Globalist
Posts: 2,586
As is always the answer for questions like this. Demand. Apparently more O/D pax in LAX want to go to ITO than in SFO. My guess is that its a bit more secluded and more private residences for the LAX crowd.
nevansm is offline  
Reply