RCyyz's argument is completely non-sensical, don't fall for such strawman argument. He/she claimed, incorrectly, that there is no legal argument when in fact there are. Each province does it their own way, some are more explicit than others but no Canadian court as far as I am concerned is going to rely on AC's ToC and ignore the rights of consumers and allow unilateral cancellation of contracts without proper justification at potentially great cost and injury to consumers. In fact, Canadian courts are generally very protective of consumers vs. big corporations' abuses such that even if something is not explicitly prescribed in the law, the judge can still order it as relief as he/she sees fit. Canadian judges are generally given a lot of flexibility in what they can do, which is why laws such as EU261 can be adjudicated and considered by some Canadian courts even when it is not a part of federal or provincial law. The caveat is there are some inter-provincial differences, so it is a case of YMMV. CTA is not a court and it is best ignored and pretend it doesn't exist.