I see, I guess that makes some sense. I just don't understand their phrasing in their terms then. Why do they say an open jaw can be in lieu of one of the two stopovers. Why doesn't it just say an open jaw can be in lieu of the point of turnaround or origin.

I get that it is semantics and that it may be industry standard but having that sentence there, to me, makes it seem as if you can have an open jaw with any of those stopovers. I'd argue that anyone who speaks/reads English would agree with that.

I do appreciate your explanation though, just frustrated a bit. I can re-arrange my segs and still do what I want but it's been quite a waste of time.